Clarification about the Un-jobfair/Democamp
The suggestions in my last post haven’t proven to be particularly popular (see trackbacks on that story), but I think my tone may have been misinterpreted. As I posted in the comments on the Remarkk blog:
What I was trying to suggest, was that perhaps another event could grow out of the current structure that could better serve those looking for people and those looking for work. When a student (or anyone else) has something cool to show, they should by all means, but I would rather see projects demoed that people are passionate about than a project someone created to audition for a job. That can be hard to determine of course, but if there was a more formal jobfair type event for this community, perhaps people wouldn’t feel like they had to demo just to meet people who might hire them. I’m not entirely sure if that’s how some people feel, but I’m hoping my post at least opens a dialogue.
There have been 11 Democamps now and we’ve seen everything from polished products (Bubbleshare, Nuvvo, Idee’s products) to pseudo case studies (Paruba, 2ndSite’s Funnel) to evangelists (Perl, SmallTalk) to school projects. Now I haven’t looked through all of the Democamp wikis and done a detailed study, but it feels to me as though the earlier Democamps had a greater variety in the demos that were shown. That might be partly due to the first come first serve sign up process and I think it might also have something to do with how popular Democamp has become. I know of at least a few groups that have decided not to show for competitive reasons. That was less of a problem when the group was smaller and close knit.
Maybe I’m over thinking things. The original idea behind Democamp was that it would be an opportunity for the Toronto tech community to show off the cool things they are working on. As mandates go, it’s a great one. As long as we stick to that and the people who sign up to demo are doing so in good faith, we should be fine.
Comments(0)